Am Montag, den 06.06.2016, 16:56 +0100 schrieb Lee Jones: > We're about to split the current API into two, where consumers will > be forced to be explicit when requesting reset lines. The choice > will be to either the call the *_exclusive or *_shared variant > depending on whether they can actually tolorate not being asserted > when that request is made. > > The new API will look like this once reorded and complete: > > reset_control_get_exclusive() > reset_control_get_shared() > reset_control_get_optional_exclusive() > reset_control_get_optional_shared() > of_reset_control_get_exclusive() > of_reset_control_get_shared() > of_reset_control_get_exclusive_by_index() > of_reset_control_get_shared_by_index() > devm_reset_control_get_exclusive() > devm_reset_control_get_shared() > devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive() > devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared() > devm_reset_control_get_exclusive_by_index() > devm_reset_control_get_shared_by_index() > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> I have applied patches 1-5 to my reset/next branch. regards Philipp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
