Hi Frank,
Am Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2016, 11:23:26 schrieb Frank Wang:
> On 2016/6/14 21:27, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Am Montag, 13. Juni 2016, 10:10:10 schrieb Frank Wang:
> >> The newer SoCs (rk3366, rk3399) take a different usb-phy IP block
> >> than rk3288 and before, and most of phy-related registers are also
> >> different from the past, so a new phy driver is required necessarily.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Frank Wang <frank.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Changes in v5:
> >> - Added 'reg' in the data block to match the different phy-blocks in
> >> dt.
> >>
> >> Changes in v4:
> >> - Removed some processes related to 'vbus_host-supply'.
> >>
> >> Changes in v3:
> >> - Resolved the mapping defect between fixed value in driver and the
> >>
> >> property in devicetree.
> >>
> >> - Optimized 480m output clock register function.
> >> - Code cleanup.
> >>
> >> Changes in v2:
> >> - Changed vbus_host operation from gpio to regulator in *_probe.
> >> - Improved the fault treatment relate to 480m clock register.
> >> - Cleaned up some meaningless codes in *_clk480m_disable.
> >> - made more clear the comment of *_sm_work.
> >>
> >> drivers/phy/Kconfig | 7 +
> >> drivers/phy/Makefile | 1 +
> >> drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c | 645
> >>
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 653 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> +
> >> +static int rockchip_usb2phy_exit(struct phy *phy)
> >> +{
> >> + struct rockchip_usb2phy_port *rport = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> >> +
> >>
> > if (!rport->port_cfg)
> >
> > return 0;
> >>
> >> + if (rport->port_id == USB2PHY_PORT_HOST)
> >> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&rport->sm_work);
> >> +
> >
> > you will also need to resume the port here, if it is suspended at this
> > point, as phy_power_off gets called after phy_exit and would probably
> > produce clk enable/disable mismatches otherwise.
>
> Hmm, from my personal point of view, when canceling sm_work here, it may
> not cause the port goes to suspend, isn't it? besides, clk only prepared
> in *_usb2phy_resume(), and unprepared in *_usb2phy_suspend(), so if we
> resume port here, the prepare_count of clk will be increased again, I
> am afraid this is not correct, and am I wrong? would you like to tell me
> more details?
usb2phy_resume gets called both initially through phy_power_on as well.
So it's on but through the first scheduled work call, might get suspended when
nothing is connected. (clk_enable and clk_disable will run).
If nothing is connected on unload phy_power_off will get called while the
clock actually is still disabled.
So I think it's either resuming on exit, or at least making sure to do nothing
in that case in the phy_power_off callback of the driver.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
