On 10/06/16 12:16, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> writes: >> If there is a failure after pm_runtime_enable/get_sync() >> we need to call pm_runtime_disable/put_sync(). >> >> Otherwise it will lead to an unbalanced pm_runtime_enable() on the >> subsequent probe if the earlier probe bailed out due to -EPROBE_DEFER. >> >> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> > > where is this supposed to be applied? You're not checking if On your testing/next > pm_runtime_get() failed at all. > I'm not adding pm_runtime_get in my patch. Just fixing up the failure path in core.c. cheers, -roger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
