On 05/31/2016 02:58 AM, Peter Chen wrote: > On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 11:36:13AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote: >> All, how we move on for this? >> >> 1. Using a generic driver to manage both mmc and USB (and further >> subsystem), USB and further subsystem do not use pwrseq node in dts. >> 2. USB creates the similar driver under drivers/usb for its own use. >> >> Which one do you prefer, thanks. >> > > Hi Krzysztof Kozlowski, > > I think option 1 may be better according to Rob and Ulf's comment. Hi, I like the option #1 as well. The generic driver should rely and parse existing bindings like 'reset-gpios'. Still additional property (e.g. "do-the-power-sequence") seems needed as we do not want to play with all reset-gpios in DTB. > Would you like going on your patch set? You can work on generic pwrseq > driver, I will do USB stuffs based on generic pwrseq driver? Great, that sounds good! I'll start the work. Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
