Am 27.05.2016 14:23, schrieb Michal Nazarewicz:
> On Fri, May 27 2016, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> This loop is supposed to set all the .num values to -1 but it's doesn't
>> set the first element and it sets one element beyond the end of the
>> array. Really there is no reason for it to be done backwards. And
>> "ret" is the wrong variable to use for an iterator.
>>
>> Fixes: ddf8abd25994 ('USB: f_fs: the FunctionFS driver')
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> How on Earth could I have made that mistake is beyond my
> comprehension. O_o On second thought, things being beyond one’s
> comprehension is probably how bugs are introduced…
>
>> ---
>> I just spotted this reviewing the code, I have not tested it. Please
>> review carefully, the vla_ptr() macro is difficult to understand.
>
> Yeah. In retrospect I’m not sure savings in memory those macros bring
> offset time engineers spent trying to understand them. Damn you clang!
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
>> index 73515d5..7fff81a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
>> @@ -2777,11 +2777,11 @@ static int _ffs_func_bind(struct usb_configuration *c,
>> ffs->raw_descs_length);
>>
>> memset(vla_ptr(vlabuf, d, inums), 0xff, d_inums__sz);
>> - for (ret = ffs->eps_count; ret; --ret) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < ffs->eps_count; i++) {
>> struct ffs_ep *ptr;
>>
>> ptr = vla_ptr(vlabuf, d, eps);
>
> As pointed by Walter, this could be moved outside. Maybe
>
> i = ffs->eps_count;
> for (struct ffs_ep *ptr = vla_ptr(vlabuf, d, eps); i; ++ptr, --i)
> ptr->num = -1;
>
I think staying with an array here improves readability.
re,
wh
>> - ptr[ret].num = -1;
>> + ptr[i].num = -1;
>> }
>>
>> /* Save pointers
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
