On 05/04/2016 11:01 PM, Bin Liu wrote:
Commit 754fe4a92c07 ("usb: musb: Remove ifdefs for TX DMA for musb_host.c")
looks incomplete: the DMA engine checks are done outside the Mentor/UX500
handler but inside the CPPI/TUSB handler. Move the checks out of the CPPI/
TUSB handler into its caller, musb_tx_dma_program().
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: usb/drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c
===================================================================
--- usb.orig/drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c
+++ usb/drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c
@@ -678,9 +678,6 @@ static int musb_tx_dma_set_mode_cppi_tus
{
struct dma_channel *channel = hw_ep->tx_channel;
- if (!is_cppi_enabled(hw_ep->musb) && !tusb_dma_omap(hw_ep->musb))
- return -ENODEV;
-
channel->actual_len = 0;
Since this function has only two lines now, does it make sense to get rid
of it completely?
That would be the reverse to what Tony's patches did. I think gcc will
inline this function anyway.
Regards,
-Bin.
/*
@@ -704,9 +701,11 @@ static bool musb_tx_dma_program(struct d
if (musb_dma_inventra(hw_ep->musb) || musb_dma_ux500(hw_ep->musb))
res = musb_tx_dma_set_mode_mentor(dma, hw_ep, qh, urb,
offset, &length, &mode);
- else
+ else if (is_cppi_enabled(hw_ep->musb) || tusb_dma_omap(hw_ep->musb))
res = musb_tx_dma_set_mode_cppi_tusb(dma, hw_ep, qh, urb,
offset, &length, &mode);
+ else
+ return false;
Well, using ret = -EINVAL; would have been more appropriate, I'd respin if
you won't mind?
if (res)
return false;
MBR, Seregi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
