On Wednesday 14 January 2009 20:43:39 Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 03:13:36PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:08:28 -0600 > > > > David Hagood <david.hagood@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 10:28 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via > > > > the bugzilla web interface). > > > > > > OK, you asked for it - no fair complaining about the email wart that I > > > can do nothing about. > > > > It happens. > > > > > > On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:29:31 -0800 (PST) > > > > bugme-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > > > > Is this a USB thing, or an input thing? > > > > > > I'm not sure I understand the question. The problem is in the > > > usbtouchscreen kernel module, which is an input module. > > > > > > The problem is NOT at the X layer (read: user space), but in the kernel > > > driver. > > > > > > Did that answer the question? > > > > The question was asked of the USB and input developers ;) It's unclear > > (to me) which subsystem would need fixing to make this work properly. > > I suppose this is device-specific and will have to be worked around in > the driver buy resubmitting request a few times until it "sticks". Hmm, I take it back... the message comes from the IRQ routine; that means we were able to submit IRQ at least once. Plus we do send a few control messages for mtouch. So I don't understand why it would start returning -ENODEV out of sudden. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
