Hi, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 01:25:27PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> > this to be just a normal regulator_get(). > >> jokes aside, this regulator is optional because not all platforms >> require a SW controlled regulator, no ? Will normal regulator_get() give >> us a dummy regulator in case it's not listed in DT/ACPI ? > > Yes we do that, but even regulators that are not software controlled okay, good. > should really be described anyway since it's a much simpler rule for okay, we'll wait until all vendors update their ACPI tables ;-) > people to understand, it ensures that we can just scale up on systems > where there does happen to be software control and it makes all the > resulting code much simpler and hence less error prone if we're not > randomly ignoring some errors. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
