Hi, On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 16:11 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 11:21:05AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Apr 2016, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 05:08:03PM +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote: > > > > NULL pointer dereferrence will happen when class driver > > > > wants to allocate zero length buffer and pool_max[0] > > > > can't be used, so skip reserved pool in this case. > > > > > > Why would a driver want to allocate a 0 length buffer? What driver does > > > this? > > > > > > Shouldn't we fix that issue instead? > > > > And even if a driver does want to allocate a 0-length buffer, shouldn't > > the function simply return early instead of running through all its > > calculations? > > Yes it should, Chunfeng, can you fix this patch to do that please. > Ok, I will fix it later > thanks, > > greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
