Hi, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >> > I should have noticed this before. If something goes wrong with the >> > 2048-sector limit, this doesn't permit the user to override. Shouldn't >> > the test for USB_SPEED_SUPER go after the other FL_MAX_SECTORS tests? >> >> you mean that a USB3 device with US_FL_MAX_SECTORS* should still respect >> the 64 limit ? yeah I can do that. I'll send a new version tomorrow (so >> I can wait for confirmation from you) > > Yes, that's exactly what I meant. Otherwise we will be unable to > handle such devices, if (or when!) they show up. alright, cool. v4 coming right up ;-) -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
