On Thu, 7 Apr 2016, Michal Nazarewicz wrote: > Sounds good to me. I’d love someone to test this patch (I sadly have no > way of doing that at the moment) and with that I can resend it with > updated message. Ivaylo should be able to try it. > > BTW, is configfs capable of adding a single instance twice in different > > configs? Or is that again something only legacy gadgets can do? > > I don’t think so. I might be wrong though, but here’s configuration > from the original post: > > mkdir functions/mass_storage.0 > echo $file > functions/mass_storage.0/lun.0/file > ln -s functions/mass_storage.0 configs/c.1 > ln -s functions/mass_storage.0 configs/c.2 > > This makes me suspect it’s not possible to link a function instance to > the same configuration twice, but now that I think about it, I’m not > quite sure what would happen if one did: > > ln -s functions/mass_storage.0 configs/c.1/foo > ln -s functions/mass_storage.0 configs/c.1/bar Do you think it would be worthwhile to check for this possibility in the driver and report an error? Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
