On Mon, 7 Mar 2016, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Did someone look at the next/follow-ups in this thread? > For example: D6629 "x86: Emit LAHF/SAHF instead of PUSHF/POPF" [2]? Using LAHF/SAHF would "solve" it, as IF is at bit #9. The question is whether they need to play with flags here at all. On Mon, 7 Mar 2016, Sedat Dilek wrote: > So, if Clang is producing wrong X86 code here, is it possible to turn > interrupts on/off manually? But, hmm that affects other places as well > in the Linux sources, so. This issue needs to be handled in the compiler. -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
