Hi, Felipe Ferreri Tonello <eu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > [ text/plain ] > Hi Michal, > > On March 5, 2016 4:28:45 PM GMT+00:00, Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On Wed, Mar 02 2016, Felipe F. Tonello wrote: >>>>> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ >>>>> * Copyright (C) 2006 Thumtronics Pty Ltd. >>>>> * Ben Williamson <ben.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> * >>>>> - * Licensed under the GPL-2 or later. >>>>> + * Licensed under the GPLv2. >> >>> On March 4, 2016 7:17:31 PM GMT+00:00, Michal Nazarewicz >><mina86@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Any particular reason to do that? >> >>On Fri, Mar 04 2016, Felipe Ferreri Tonello wrote: >>> Because the kernel is v2 only and not later. >> >>Linux as a whole is GPLv2 only, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that >>parts of it cannot be dual licensed (or GPLv2+). It’s safer to leave >>copyright noticed clear unless you explicitly want your contribution be >>GPLv2 only which brings the whole file GPLv2 only. >> >>> I just tried to make this driver more consistent with the coding >>style >>> used across the kernel. That's it. >> >>Column alignment of field names or RHS of assignment operators is quite >>inconsistent already within drivers/usb/gadget/ which is why I’m >>concerned whether this is really helping. >> >>Anyway, I actually don’t care much, just adding my two rappen. > > Right, I am ok with Balbi completely ignoring this patch. But I prefer > to have at least this driver consistent than nothing. Of course I'll > remove the license change I made. consistent in what way ? -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
