-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Add generic support for RGB LED's. > > Basic idea is to use enum led_brightness also for the hue and > saturation color components.This allows to implement the color > extension w/o changes to struct led_classdev. > > Select LEDS_RGB to enable building drivers using the RGB > extension. > > Flag LED_SET_HUE_SAT allows to specify that hue / saturation > should be overridden even if the provided values are zero. > > Some examples for writing values to > /sys/class/leds/<xx>/brightness: (now also hex notation can be > used) > > 255 -> set full brightness and keep existing color if set 0 -> > switch LED off but keep existing color so that it can be > restored > if the LED is switched on again later > 0x1000000 -> switch LED off and set also hue and saturation to > 0 0x00ffff -> set full brightness, full saturation and set hue > to 0 (red) > I admit I hadn't seen this earlier, and I didn't spend all day looking at previous attempts, but what's the motivation for putting all this overloaded syntax into the "brightness" file? I thought the point was to have a single value in each file, one of the references I did find was http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-leds/msg02995.html Is there some thread where this was decided as advantageous? Surely 0-255 for _brightness_ is what the brightness entry should do? I'd like to set the rgb colour of a led (or hsv, that can be it's own file too) and separately ramp the brightness up and down. I also think it's substantially simpler and easier to use from the user's point of view, which is surely the place you want easy right? Sincerely, Karl Palsson -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJW3Jk5AAoJEBmotQ/U1cr2fxYP/AsuQ/x8ky86S9xf9Y8UdRrk IC7eouBpf07RsDTv2KobRwEH69tk12zxGKmOpNZ5SY8ozVT/VDXMA8Iw/cwKL2t4 EBWTdBhORrOlfxw0sykp4SXYSYBm9n2Z+xZGK9b/fN+2g+XCv4B+W2iDejyvAsIt c/eH6dGR0PvYdovEh0Tq7qAflpXRAhU0ykRR0Ydq/HrF8Xfxi+MDHC99zTRrHIsV rPTbPh26cxZ3zyOoUxwgPLNmm4O1BvMsghxuQXV49A95gOlRet+ewDQxBgwWabEp AUh3fuOl53R/ODJSqjX/JjlO4ynXWgv/9kdCF8QwPUAl13gyhilPvIdI5O3gm3Nr beiW/rUnvHej3ZxbRUe/Q8ZlQ099WTVH4cEgSxLclC5hiWm4dCjsjskJA1acbnZV 4w5WSqrAqSyNP81Rhy7WV6k8kazDUrASSAl4JFnNJVRC4WNdHQJA4pKkH08mtYyo 5ls3ydMzU2eiTNKCFEze4/cH3MgUWM+L29rLRzev6rT7s32rPzR0JKaKv460pocd rjpKanbt+zgUVySprVzX4t4GsmDZtKjQkTGooz9BabZP5+WeVvDtEMK3kciZ1d/x ubtvcMXGbDpZ0FMcQkTQj44Sq3wMdr3P0CoMiDspDGk7XY67gSXsmUgSSh0JTLRL X4K67h/OUpH0A00XGZCO =86mG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----