On Wednesday 03 February 2016 20:15:47 Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Hi Arnd, > > > >> arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/ixp4xx-regs.h | 198 --------- > >> arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/pxa25x-udc.h | 163 -------- > > > > for arch/arm I need Acked-by from relevant folks. > You already have mine for arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/pxa25x-udc.h I think, > or did my mailer betray me again ... I saw it. > I cannot speak for ixp4xx though. Krzysztof Halasa <khalasa@xxxxxxx> gave an Ack for the first patch already, and I think we concluded that the patch was keeping the current behavior otherwise and is therefore not a regression, though we did not finish the side-discussion about whether ixp4xx actually works in both BE and LE mode with both indirect and direct I/O, or which of the four combinations is broken. > > Also, do you think we need this during the -rc or can we consider it > > non-critical fixes for v4.6 merge window ? I meant it for 4.6, sorry for not being very clear about that. All the warnings I fixed in this series are harmless as far as I can tell, and they only show up in rare randconfig builds. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
