On Mon, 4 Jan 2016, Geyslan G. Bem wrote:
> This patch fixes an unsigned comparison to less than 0.
No, it doesn't. It changes an unsigned comparison for less than or
equal to 0, which is very different from less than 0.
> Signed-off-by: Geyslan G. Bem <geyslan@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> I'm not sure about that comparison because in qh_lines() temp receives
> the snprintf() return and thereafter occurs this comparison:
>
> if (size < temp)
> temp = size;
>
> Is it a test of string truncation right? That possibility is being
> treated. But if after some snprintf returns the temp is exactly size
> minus 1 (trailing null)? Could this scenario happen? If yes, I think
> size could be not counting correctly. Let me know more about it.
I think the two weird code sequences in qh_lines() were written before
scnprintf existed. They should be changed to use scnprintf instead of
snprintf; then the "if (size < temp) temp = size;" things can be
removed.
> drivers/usb/host/ehci-dbg.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-dbg.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-dbg.c
> index 980ca55..1645120 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-dbg.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-dbg.c
> @@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ static ssize_t fill_async_buffer(struct debug_buffer *buf)
> next += temp;
>
> list_for_each_entry(qh, &ehci->async_unlink, unlink_node) {
> - if (size <= 0)
> + if (size == 0)
> break;
> qh_lines(ehci, qh, &next, &size);
> }
The new line does exactly the same thing as the old line. There's no
reason to make this change.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
