Hi, John Youn <John.Youn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Interesting. You're getting a new parameter that's never been needed >> in the code before and (as far as I can tell) isn't used anywhere in >> your series. I presume this is in prep for a future patch that uses >> this? >> >> At the moment you're burning a decent delay to read this unused >> parameter (potentially up to 100ms), so hopefully there's a good use >> for it eventually... > > I'll remove this from this series. It will be used by the gadget but > those changes aren't ready to be submitted yet. so you're sending this series again ? Seems like I should drop all patches from my testing/next ? -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
