2015-12-10 11:44 GMT-03:00 Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 12/10/2015 04:05 PM, Geyslan G. Bem wrote:
>
>>>>> Don't use the 'do {} while (0)' wrapper in a single statement macro.
>>>>>
>>>>> Caught by checkpatch: "WARNING: Single statement macros should not
>>>>> use a do {} while (0) loop"
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Geyslan G. Bem <geyslan@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/usb/host/ehci.h | 4 ++--
>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci.h b/drivers/usb/host/ehci.h
>>>>> index cfeebd8..945000a 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci.h
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci.h
>>>>> @@ -244,9 +244,9 @@ struct ehci_hcd { /* one per
>>>>> controller */
>>>>> /* irq statistics */
>>>>> #ifdef EHCI_STATS
>>>>> struct ehci_stats stats;
>>>>> -# define COUNT(x) do { (x)++; } while (0)
>>>>> +# define COUNT(x) ((x)++)
>>>>> #else
>>>>> -# define COUNT(x) do {} while (0)
>>>>> +# define COUNT(x) ((void) 0)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why not just empty #define?
>>>
>>>
>>> Indeed. I'll change it.
>>> Tks Sergei.
>>
>>
>> Since COUNT is not used to return the empty #define is ok. Another way
>> is to use #define COUNT(x) (0) to get a 0 when necessary to read
>> returns.
>
>
> Just 0, no parens please.
Ok, no parens, since there's no evaluation.
Then my change is:
-# define COUNT(x) do { (x)++; } while (0)
+# define COUNT(x) (++(x))
#else
-# define COUNT(x) do {} while (0)
+# define COUNT(x) 0
Pre-increment allowing to return the updated x.
>
> MBR, Sergei
>
--
Regards,
Geyslan G. Bem
hackingbits.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
