On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 10:41 -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > > A recent patch, 7fa40910e0bf5ef32eca49595d950cb24f6402bf, added a > > CONNECTED retry for a different reason and I could simply increase > > this retry time. Any thoughts? > > I don't know. You've got a non-compliant host combined with an > excessively slow device. It seems unwise to penalize everybody by > slowing down their resumes (by 500 ms!) just because of this one > bad combination. > > On the other hand, I don't have any better ideas. Yet another quirk. Assume this to be necessary only if the port was connected to a quirky device before loss of power. Regards Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
