On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:28 AM, Konstantin Shkolnyy
> <konstantin.shkolnyy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> +static bool cp210x_tx_empty(struct usb_serial_port *port)
>> +{
>> + int err;
>> + u32 count;
>> +
>> + err = cp210x_get_tx_queue_byte_count(port, &count);
>
>> + if (!err && count)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + return true;
>
> return err || !count;
To me, expressing it like this is harder to read. The code as I wrote
it, in my mind, reads like this:
if successfully read the counter and it's not 0 then
tx is not empty, return false
> Btw, can be count left uninitialized?
When the function succeeds it assigns a value to count.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
