Hi, Tim Bird <tim.bird@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 11/16/2015 09:21 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Peter Chen <peter.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 09:48:00AM -0800, Tim Bird wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 11/10/2015 07:14 PM, Peter Chen wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 04:46:51PM -0800, Tim Bird wrote: >>>>>> This fixes a bug where if you disconnect and re-connect the USB cable, >>>>>> the gadget driver stops working. >>>>>> >>>>>> Add support for async_irq to wake up driver from low power mode. >>>>>> Without this, the power management code never calls resume. >>>>>> Also, have the phy driver kick the gadget driver (chipidea otg) >>>>>> by having the chipidea driver register with it, for vbus connect >>>>>> notifications. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tim Bird <tim.bird@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> drivers/usb/chipidea/udc.c | 6 ++++++ >>>>>> drivers/usb/phy/phy-msm-usb.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ >>>>>> include/linux/usb/msm_hsusb.h | 1 + >>>>>> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+) >> >> I just wanna know how you guys want this to be handled ? Through my tree >> or chipidea's ? Or do we break the dependencies between the changes ? > > I'm fine with splitting it up. I'm sending a new series with 3 patches > right after this message. Do both trees go to linux-next? I have my fixes and next branches both on next. Not sure about chipidea. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
