Re: Infrastructure for zerocopy I/O

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 02:07:58PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
>> If we really want to do zerocopy I/O then we should not use a bounce
>> buffer.  But the only way to avoid bounce buffers may be to give user
>> programs a way of allocating memory pages below 4 GB, because lots of
>> USB hardware can only do 32-bit DMA.
>
> But any system worth it's money these days has an IOMMU.
>

you're definitely wrong with that
routers, smartphones, settopboxes, NAS systems, etc. seems like you're
sticking with X86 platform.
USB is the most versatile bus system out there you'll find it in the
range from embedded microprocessors up to
high end systems. You will always have to expect that some system will
not or some architecture will never support IOMMU
due cut down design limitations out there.

>> Is there an API for allocating user memory below 4 GB?  Would a new
>> MMAP flag be acceptable?
>
> You'll have to ask the MM folks.  But I doubt they will be excited about it.

Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux