Hi, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, 5 Nov 2015, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Oliver Neukum <oneukum@xxxxxxxx> writes: >> > On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 16:26 -0500, Alan Stern wrote: >> >> This doesn't need to be stored as one of the usb-storage flags. And >> >> since we are close to running out of flag bits (on 32-bit >> >> architectures), it would be better not to use one of them for this. >> > >> > Do we want the opposite flag? 25% for known good devices >> > is visible. >> >> You mean for USB2 devices ? I was thinking about that last night and >> wanted to "whitelist" at least our own mass storage gadget, provided >> that it works just fine with anything you give it (so far). >> >> Something like US_FL_NO_SECTOR_LIMIT ? > > There already is a whitelist flag for the Mass Storage gadget: > US_FL_CAPACITY_OK. Right now its meaning is limited to the READ > CAPACITY bug, but it could easily be repurposed since no other > whitelist entries use that flag. cool, I'll have a look at try to make sure we increase sector limit to 2048 for that one as well :-) -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
