Hi Maxime, On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 01:01:09AM +0300, Ruslan Bilovol wrote: >> This patchset adds independent registration of gadgets >> and gadget drivers to udc-core. This is very useful for >> built-in modules into kernel case since it's possible >> situation that gadget driver is probing at a time >> when no gadgets are registered in udc-core. >> In this case instead of silently failing without >> of any attempt to recover, with independent registration >> of gadgets and gadget drivers there is no matter >> in which order gadgets and gadget drivers are >> probed/registered. >> >> This patch has side-effect on gadget drivers that had >> __init/__exit attributes on some paths like bind/unbind >> and (since bind/unbind may happen at any time) should >> not use them now. This is covered by forth patch >> > > Has there been any progress on these patches? They're fixing some real > issue that we're seeing, and it seems to both work quite well and not > generate a lot of pushback. This patch series has stack on review due to different views on checking input parameters of externally visible function. I see there is no any way to get these patches accepted other than skip checking validity of some input parameters as was pointed by Alan, although I disagree with it. I will post updated patch series later Best regards, Ruslan > > Thanks! > Maxime > > -- > Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons > Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering > http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
