Re: mass storage behaviour

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 5 Oct 2015, Paul Jones wrote:

> > Increasing the max_sectors_kb value, on the other hand, might remove
> > overhead by allowing a higher percentage of the transfer to consist of
> > real data as opposed to CBW and CSW packets.  This depends to some
> > extent on other factors (such as whether the memory pages are
> > contiguous, allowing for larger transfers), but it can't hurt.
> 
> I tried changing the max_sectors_kb to 64 with 64k block size in dd and it’s transferring at the same speed.

That's a decrease, not an increase.  Try changing it to 1024 or more.

> I verified using usbmon and it then indeed requests 64k in each request.
> Increasing the dd block size to 240k doesn’t change the transfer speed either, and it keeps using alternating 120k/8k requests.
> Increasing the dd block size to 1M doesn’t change the transfer speed either, although I get sequences of 2x 120k followed by 1x 16k requests.

The dd block size makes no difference at all, because the kernel 
aggregates the requests from dd.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux