On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Eric Curtin <ericcurtin17@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> My first kernel patch, hope I did everything correctly! Instead of calling strlen on every iteration of the for loop, just call it once instead and store in a variable.
Heh. Ok, that resulted in a rather long email thread.
Anyway, I'd actually prefer to merge this patch, for two reasons:
- the "termination calculation is expensive" problem is a real
problem, and while in this case the compiler may be able to notice
that the "strlen()" is constant over the loop and can be hoisted up,
that is not at all necessarily the case most of the time.
So I actually think patches like this are good things. Not because
this particular code site necessarily matters, but because people who
write code with things like "strlen()" in the terminating condition
need to learn that it's *wrong*.
- I'd much rather see this kind of trivial patch than the usual
trivial patch that is clearly just "let's run some script on the
kernel and fix up warnings it generates mindlessly".
In contrast to that, *this* trivial patch was about somebody who
thought about code generation and efficiency. And *that* is the kind
of trivial patches we want to encourage, not necessariyl because this
particular case was so important, but because that's the kind of
people and thinking we want to encourage.
So quite frankly, I'd just take this directly, but I'd like more of
real changelog.
But I wonder if Eric is even reading the emails any more ;)
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
