On 09/09/15 05:21, Peter Chen wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 03:25:25PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote: >> >> >> On 08/09/15 11:31, Peter Chen wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 01:23:01PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote: >>>> On 07/09/15 04:23, Peter Chen wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 04:21:18PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote: >>>>>> + * This is used by the USB Host stack to register the Host controller >>>>>> + * to the OTG core. Host controller must not be started by the >>>>>> + * caller as it is left upto the OTG state machine to do so. >>>>>> + * >>>>>> + * Returns: 0 on success, error value otherwise. >>>>>> + */ >>>>>> +int usb_otg_register_hcd(struct usb_hcd *hcd, unsigned int irqnum, >>>>>> + unsigned long irqflags, struct otg_hcd_ops *ops) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + struct usb_otg *otgd; >>>>>> + struct device *hcd_dev = hcd->self.controller; >>>>>> + struct device *otg_dev = usb_otg_get_device(hcd_dev); >>>>>> + >>>>> >>>>> One big problem here is: there are two designs for current (IP) driver >>>>> code, one creates dedicated hcd device as roothub's parent, like dwc3. >>>>> Another one doesn't do this, roothub's parent is core device (or otg device >>>>> in your patch), like chipidea and dwc2. >>>>> >>>>> Then, otg_dev will be glue layer device for chipidea after that. >>>> >>>> OK. Let's add a way for the otg controller driver to provide the host and gadget >>>> information to the otg core for such devices like chipidea and dwc2. >>>> >>> >>> Roger, not only chipidea and dwc2, I think the musb uses the same >>> hierarchy. If the host, device, and otg share the same register >>> region, host part can't be a platform driver since we don't want >>> to remap the same register region again. >>> >>> So, in the design, we may need to consider both situations, one >>> is otg/host/device has its own register region, and host is a >>> separate platform device (A), the other is three parts share the >>> same register region, there is only one platform driver (B). >>> >>> A: >>> >>> IP core device >>> | >>> | >>> |-----|-----| >>> gadget host platform device >>> | >>> roothub >>> >>> B: >>> >>> IP core device >>> | >>> | >>> |-----|-----| >>> gadget roothub >>> >>> >>>> This API must be called before the hcd/gadget-driver is added so that the otg >>>> core knows it's linked to an OTG controller. >>>> >>>> Any better idea? >>>> >>> >>> A flag stands for this hcd controller is the same with otg controller >>> can be used, this flag can be stored at struct usb_otg_config. >> >> What if there is another architecture like so? >> >> C: >> [Parent] >> | >> | >> |------------------|--------------| >> [OTG core] [gadget] [host] >> >> We need a more flexible mechanism to link the gadget and >> host device to the otg core for non DT case. >> >> How about adding struct usb_otg parameter to usb_otg_register_hcd()? >> >> e.g. >> int usb_otg_register_hcd(struct usb_otg *otg, struct usb_hcd *hcd, ..) >> >> If otg is NULL it will try DT otg-controller property or parent to >> get the otg controller. > > How usb_otg_register_hcd get struct usb_otg, from where? This only works when the parent driver creating the hcd has registered the otg controller too. > >> >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> P.S: I still read your code, I find not all APIs in this file are used >>> in your dwc3 example. >> >> Which ones? The ones for registering/unregistered host/gadget are used >> by hcd/udc core as part of usb_add/remove_hcd() and >> udc_bind_to_driver()/usb_gadget_remove_driver() >> > > Ok, now I understand your design, usb_create_hcd must be called before > the fsm kicks off. The call flow like below: > > usb_otg_register->usb_create_hcd->usb_add_hcd->usb_otg_register_hcd-> > usb_otg_start_host->usb_otg_add_hcd Actually these are the discrete steps - usb_otg_register - usb_create_hcd - usb_add_hcd->usb_otg_register_hcd (HCD is not really added till FSM in host role) Above 3 are prerequisite for FSM to start in addition to gadget controller and driver being ready. When FSM enters in host role - usb_otg_start_host(true)->usb_otg_add_hcd (Now HCD is added) When FSM exits host role - usb_otg_start_host(false)->usb_otg_remove_hcd (Now HCD is removed, but not unregistered) If HCD hardware really goes away - usb_remove_hcd->usb_otg_unregister_hcd (Now FSM stops as host resource not available) > > We need to make some changes to let chipidea work since usb_create_hcd > is included at host->start. > Yes, you just need to do the usb_add_hcd() in probe and usb_otg_start_host() during role switch. cheers, -roger -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html