Hi,
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 03:21:48PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >> + dwc->fsm->id = id;
> >> + dwc->fsm->b_sess_vld = vbus;
> >> + usb_otg_sync_inputs(dwc->fsm);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int dwc3_drd_start_host(struct otg_fsm *fsm, int on)
> >> +{
> >> + struct device *dev = usb_otg_fsm_to_dev(fsm);
> >> + struct dwc3 *dwc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >
> > how about adding a usb_otg_get_drvdata(fsm) ?
>
> You meant for otg core? That can be done.
yeah. BTW, I think otg core needs quite a few changes to become actually
useful. Currently it's just too much pointer ping-pong going back and
forth between phy, otg core, udc and hcd.
Also, I caught a ton of issues with it and suspend/resume. You might
want to fix them before adding more users to it.
It's also rather racy and that needs fixing too. On top of all that, I
think there's too much being added to UDC just to get Dual-Role, let's
see if we can improve that too.
> >> @@ -843,6 +998,16 @@ static int dwc3_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> hird_threshold = 12;
> >>
> >> if (node) {
> >> + if (of_property_read_bool(node, "extcon"))
> >> + dwc->edev = extcon_get_edev_by_phandle(dev, 0);
> >> + else if (of_property_read_bool(dev->parent->of_node, "extcon"))
> >> + dwc->edev = extcon_get_edev_by_phandle(dev->parent, 0);
> >
> > why do you need to check the parent ? Why isn't that done on the glue
> > layer ?
>
> On DRA7-evm, the extcon device is defined in the glue layer node. But
> we need the device both at the glue layer and at the core layer.
why do you need extcon here ? Glue updates core via UTMI about the
states, right ? So you should get proper VBUS and ID status via OTG IRQ.
Is that not working ?
> We do get the extcon device in dwc3-omap.c
>
> Any suggestion how to pass the extcon device from glue layer to core.c?
> Or should I add the extcon property to dwc3 USB node as well in the DT?
GPIO toggles
dwc3-omap extcon event
update status via UTMI STATUS register
OTG IRQ on core
Horray!
:-)
> >> +
> >> + if (IS_ERR(dwc->edev)) {
> >> + dev_vdbg(dev, "couldn't get extcon device\n");
> >
> > dev_err() ??
>
> Is it ok to print it even in EPROBE_DEFER case?
hmm, probably pointless, indeed.
--
balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
