On 25.08.2015 08:30, John Youn wrote:
> On 8/18/2015 11:54 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> this driver has long ago became dwc2.ko with
>> both peripheral and host roles, there's no point
>> in keeping the old function names.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c | 4 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smartq.c | 4 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smdk6410.c | 4 +-
>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/devs.c | 6 +-
>> drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h | 52 +--
>> drivers/usb/dwc2/core_intr.c | 4 +-
>> drivers/usb/dwc2/debugfs.c | 20 +-
>> drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c | 696 ++++++++++++++++----------------
>> drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd.c | 4 +-
>> drivers/usb/dwc2/platform.c | 8 +-
>> include/linux/platform_data/s3c-hsotg.h | 10 +-
>
> Hi Felipe,
>
> For dwc2/*:
>
> Acked-by: John Youn <johnyoun@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: John Youn <johnyoun@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> Also, can any s3c64xx maintainers comment on this platform code?
It's the first time I see this topic. I did not receive the patch so
it's hard to comment on something I could not read. :)
> Has the dwc2 driver been used and tested on these platforms since
> becoming dwc2? I'm not sure how the driver matching is done since
> I don't see anything in the device tree and the device name seems
> to be "s3c-hsotg".
>
> Also, are there plans to remove the usage of the platform data?
You mean since 117777b2c3b ("usb: dwc2: Move gadget probe function")
which effectively removed matching driver by device name? Probably no
one tested it. There aren't many users of s3c6410...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
