On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 01:28:30PM -0500, Bin Liu wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 12:21:29PM -0500, Bin Liu wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Currently, the sysfs MUSB node name uses kernel device name global >> >> *auto* convention. So depending on kernel configuration, the two MUSB >> >> device nodes could be musb-hdrc.0.auto/musb-hdrc.1.auto, or >> >> musb-hdrc.1.auto/musb-hdrc.2.auto. Of cause the index could be any >> >> other number if there were more devices using this naming convention. >> >> >> >> Why we decided to name MUSB nodes this way? It gives me a lot of >> >> troubles in scripting and documentation. >> > >> > it's just the device name, that's all. We could name it with a string >> > representing the register address. Something like 'musb-47401c00' >> >> Yeah, I know it is just a name, that is why I want to know if possible >> to change the default to not use the global name, to something static, >> so that it is easier for scripting and documentation? > > sure, why not ? I don't think anybody is really relying on those. Send a > patch and let's see if anybody complains. Cool, I will find a time to make the patch. Thanks. > > -- > balbi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
