On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:26:23AM -0700, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:07:08AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 05:47:46PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
>
> > > + 1500,
> > > + 1800,
> > > + 550,
> > > +};
>
> > Why 550 is the last, but not 1800?
>
> You'd have to ask the hardware engineers who designed the chip. I
> suspect it's because 550 was added at a late stage in the design process
> but I'm basically just guessing there.
>
> > > *********************************************************************/
> > > @@ -606,8 +646,31 @@ static int wm831x_power_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > }
> > > }
>
> > > + if (wm831x_pdata && wm831x_pdata->usb_gadget) {
>
> > Where the wm831x_pdata->usb_gadget is initialized?
>
> It's platform data, it will be initialised by whatever registers the
> platform data.
passing pointers through pdata ?
--
balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
