On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:44:08AM +0530, Vaishali Thakkar wrote: > On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Vaishali Thakkar <vthakkar1994@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > In big endian cases, macro cpu_to_le16 unfolds to __swab16 which > > provides special case for constants. In little endian cases, > > __constant_cpu_to_le16 and cpu_to_le16 expand directly to the > > same expression. So, replace __constant_cpu_to_le16 with > > cpu_to_le16 with the goal of getting rid of the definition of > > __constant_cpu_to_le16 completely. > > > > The semantic patch that performs this transformation is as follows: > > > > @@expression x;@@ > > > > - __constant_cpu_to_le16(x) > > + cpu_to_le16(x) > > Hello > > This is just a friendly reminder. As this patch was sent before almost 50 days > with the aim of removing constant_<foo> definitions completely > and not yet applied, is it missed?? Do I need to resend this patch? you should have received my automated email now. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
