On Mon, Jul 20 2015, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote: > Yeah I see it now. What I wrote was a problem before your patch but now > it seams to be ok, just nluns name is very misleading. Summing up, just > like you wrote this patch should not go to stable. For me nluns has always been *size* of the luns array. And with changes from my patch, it’s size in the std::vector sense, i.e. it’s not the same as capacity. Your patchset gets away from nluns so this confusion will be cleared anyway. -- Best regards, _ _ .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o ..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o) ooo +--<mpn@xxxxxxxxxx>--<xmpp:mina86@xxxxxxxxxx>--ooO--(_)--Ooo-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
