On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Yingjoe Chen
<yingjoe.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel, Chunfeng,
>
>
> On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 22:39 +0800, chunfeng yun wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 18:12 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> <...>
>> > > +
>> > > + usb_p1_vbus: fixedregulator@0 {
>> >
>> > Why @0 ?
>> It is the first fixed regulator, so set it to 0 as a index.
>> I will remove it later
>
> Since this name should be unique, I think we should use gpio number as
> address for fixedregulator in case we need other fixedregulators. So
> this could be:
>
> usb_p1_vbus: fixedregulator@130 {
>
> Also, we should sort according to the address(gpio number) for these
> nodes. Does this make sense?
Yes - that makes some sense.
But, a quick check of other "fixedregulator@" nodes in
arch/arm/boot/dts/ shows that mostly they use @0 , @1.
So, I think the original patch is probably fine.
Sorry for the noise,
-Dan
>
> Joe.C
>
>> >
>> > > + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> > > + regulator-name = "usb_vbus";
>> > > + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> > > + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> > > + gpio = <&pio 130 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> > > + enable-active-high;
>> > > + };
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
