On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 02:19:51PM +0800, chunfeng yun wrote: > hi, > On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 07:10 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 05:41:03PM +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote: > > > add a DT binding documentation of usb3.0 phy for MT65xx > > > SoCs from Mediatek. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > .../devicetree/bindings/usb/mt65xx-u3phy.txt | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/mt65xx-u3phy.txt > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/mt65xx-u3phy.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/mt65xx-u3phy.txt > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 0000000..056b2aa > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/mt65xx-u3phy.txt > > > @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ > > > +MT65xx U3PHY > > > + > > > +The device node for Mediatek SOC usb3.0 phy > > > + > > > +Required properties: > > > + - compatible : Should be "mediatek,mt8173-u3phy" > > > + - reg : Offset and length of registers, the first is for mac domain, > > > + another for phy domain > > > + - power-domains: to enable usb's mtcmos > > > + - usb-wakeup-ctrl : to access usb wakeup control register > > > + - wakeup-src : 1: ip sleep wakeup mode; 2: line state wakeup mode; others > > > + means don't enable wakeup source of usb > > > + - u2port-num : number of usb2.0 ports to support which should be 1 or 2 > > > + - clocks : must support all clocks that phy need > > > + - clock-names: should be "wakeup_deb_p0", "wakeup_deb_p1" for wakeup > > > + debounce control clocks, and "u3phya_ref" for u3phya reference clock. > > > + > > > +Example: > > > + > > > +u3phy: usb-phy@11271000 { > > > + compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-u3phy"; > > > + reg = <0 0x11271000 0 0x3000>, > > > + <0 0x11280000 0 0x20000>; > > > > 0x11271000 is the register space the xhci controller takes. You should > > not expose the same register space to two different drivers. > > > > usb: usb30@11270000 { > compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-xhci"; > reg = <0 0x11270000 0 0x1000>; > > the size of xhci register space is 0x1000, and the range is > [0x11270000, 0x11271000 - 1], so the address of 0x11271000 is not > included. Indeed, you are right. Nevertheless my datasheet lists these resources: 0x11270000 - 0x1127ffff: SSUSB CSR 0x11280000 - 0x1128ffff: SSUSB SIF 0x11290000 - 0x1129ffff: SSUSB It seems that with the current binding you are not modelling the hardware but something that reflects your current implementation. This is not a good sign. Normally I would expect device nodes that match the above resources, but your USB phy spans most of the SSUSB CSR register space and both the SSUSB SIF and SSUSB regster space. I think it would be good if you could give an overview over the USB hardware and explain why you have to violate the above resources. Also something to consider: Is your binding suitable for adding OTG support later? You don't have to add OTG support to the Kernel now, but your binding should be suitable to add it later. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html