On Wed, 8 Jul 2015, AMAN DEEP wrote: > >Your analysis is correct, but I don't like the solution. The code you > >quoted above uses *last after finish_urb(), which is not a good idea. > > > >In my opinion, it would be better to go back to the way things were > >before commit 977dcfdc6031 and remove ed from the ed_rm_list before > >finishing any URBs. Then at the end, we can add ed back to the list > >if necessary. > > > >How does the patch below look to you? Does it fix the problem? > > yes, this change is also doing the same which i wanted to do. > I think it is better way of implementing the required change. > > Should i submit the changed patch for required change ? Sure, go ahead. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
