On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 08:11:27PM -0700, David Cohen wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 08:09:54PM -0700, David Cohen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:07:05AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > > > Many drivers and modules depend on ULPI bus registeration to > > > register ULPI interfaces and drivers. It's more appropriate > > > to register ULPI bus in subsys_initcall instead of module_init. > > > > > > Kernel panic has been reported with some kind of kernel config. > > > > Even though I agree subsys_initcall is better to register ulpi bus, it's > > still no excuse to have kernel panic. What about ULPI bus being compiled > > as module? > > IMHO this is avoiding the proper kernel panic fix which should be > > failing gracefully (or defer probe) from tusb1210 driver. > > Maybe I need to express myself better :) > IMHO we should not consider work done with this patch only. It's still > incomplete. Then please fix it properly, this is not the correct solution. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
