On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 03:33:26PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > ULPI registers it's bus at module_init so if the bus fails to register, the > module will fail to load and all will be well in the world. > > However, if the ULPI code is built-in rather than a module, the bus > initialization may fail but we'd still try to register drivers later onto > a non-existant bus, which will panic the kernel. > > Fix that by checking that the bus was indeed initialized before trying to > register drivers on top of it. > > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/usb/common/ulpi.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/common/ulpi.c b/drivers/usb/common/ulpi.c > index 0e6f968..0b0a5e7 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/common/ulpi.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/common/ulpi.c > @@ -132,6 +132,10 @@ int ulpi_register_driver(struct ulpi_driver *drv) > if (!drv->probe) > return -EINVAL; > > + /* Was the bus registered successfully? */ > + if (!ulpi_bus.p) > + return -ENODEV; Ick, no, don't go mucking around in the bus internals like this, that's not ok. You should either "know" the bus is registered, or something is really wrong with the design here. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
