On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 01:57:54PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:41:09PM +0530, Ramneek Mehresh wrote: > > Add workqueue to add/remove host driver (outside interrupt context) > > upon each id change > > > > Signed-off-by: Li Yang <leoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Ramneek Mehresh <ramneek.mehresh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Fleming Andrew-AFLEMING <AFLEMING@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Tested-by: Fleming Andrew-AFLEMING <AFLEMING@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Changes for v2: > > - moved change_hcd_work into struct ehci_fsl > > > > drivers/usb/host/ehci-fsl.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > > drivers/usb/host/ehci.h | 1 - > > drivers/usb/phy/phy-fsl-usb.c | 7 ++- > > you really ought to find a way to split this patch so that phy-fsl-usb.c > and ehci changes don't depend on each other. That way I can take the phy > part through my tree while Alan handles EHCI. you see, you *just* sent your patch and I reviewed it as soon as possible. Even though you sent *only* this patch and not as a reply to the original. If you're going to send it again, either send the entire series as a new thread, or send the new revision for that patch as a reply to original. How do you expect maintainers to track your patches otherwise ? By bothering them with private emails linking to older versions of your patches ? -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
