Hi, [snip] > Felipe suggested to "divide to conquer" instead of having a single > extcon driver to handle all these functions: > > - The mux functions would be controlled by a possible new pinctrl-gpio > driver (Linus, your input here would be nice :) > - The VBUS would be a fixed regulator > - The USB ID would make usage of existent extcon-gpio > > But the on fw side, this is a single ACPI device representing a virtual > device for USB OTG port, which is nothing but a bunch of independent > GPIOs. > > I could make a mfd driver to register devices for those simpler and more > generic drivers, but according to [1] community recognized it as a hack > with ACPI since I'd need to give them the GPIO without requesting on > mfd. I believe this case could be resumed in: Would be [1] acceptable for mfd drivers? - If yes, I can split this driver into more generic ones - If no, I see no other option but having this driver fully controlling the USB OTG port. BR, David [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/18/82 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
