On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:27:28AM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:45:53PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:41:37AM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
> > > Hi Felipe, et al,
> > >
> > > Is there any on going discussion regarding to USB phy for type C connectors?
> > >
> > > We'd like to know the community's preferable direction for handling
> > > (still unsupported) cases like USB3.1 PD, Accessories and Alternate
> > > modes as a new layer or an extension of current USB phy layer.
> > >
> > > Comments are welcome :)
> >
> > Not the USB phy layer, but the generic phy layer. All you need to do is
> > add a new phy provider and add support for it from within dwc3.
> > Something like below:
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> > index 9f0e209b8f6c..55a85b40e43e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> > @@ -653,6 +653,19 @@ static int dwc3_core_get_phy(struct dwc3 *dwc)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + dwc->usb3_typec_phy = devm_phy_get(dev, "usb3-typec-phy");
> > + if (IS_ERR(dwc->usb3_typec_phy)) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(dwc->usb3_typec_phy);
> > + if (ret == -ENOSYS || ret == -ENODEV) {
> > + dwc->usb3_typec_phy = NULL;
> > + } else if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> > + return ret;
> > + } else {
> > + dev_err(dev, "no usb3 typeC phy, continuing without\n");
> > + dwc->usb3_typec_phy = NULL;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> Thanks. That's a nice direction.
btw, for typec, let's support only the new phy framework, that ought to
get people to move :-)
--
balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
