[quoted lines by Alan Stern on 2015/02/12 at 10:10 -0500] >Not to me. The purpose of signalfd is to report pending signals. >Closing or opening a file descriptor shouldn't change the set of >pending signals. Once the last signalfd file descriptor for a given signal is closed - in our case, that's only one of them - shouldn't the handling revert to the default for that signal? Isn't it wrong that, when there are no signalfd file descriptors open for a given signal, the signal still seems to stay pending within the signalfd mechanism? -- Dave Mielke | 2213 Fox Crescent | The Bible is the very Word of God. Phone: 1-613-726-0014 | Ottawa, Ontario | http://Mielke.cc/bible/ EMail: dave@xxxxxxxxx | Canada K2A 1H7 | http://FamilyRadio.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
