On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 05:59:07PM +0100, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:balbi@xxxxxx] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 4:57 PM > > To: Krzysztof Opasiak > > Cc: balbi@xxxxxx; linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > s.wadas@xxxxxxxxxxx; k.lewandowsk@xxxxxxxxxxx; > > m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx; andrzej.p@xxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: gadget: composite: Provide list of > > registered functions > > > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 05:00:18PM +0100, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote: > > > @@ -1558,13 +1559,63 @@ void unregister_gadget_item(struct > > config_item > > > *item) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unregister_gadget_item); > > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS > > > > why proc when I requested repeatedly to put this file under the > > same configfs directory where functionfs is mounted ? > > > > This patch has been sent before I got your suggestion to place it in > sysfs. not sysfs, configfs :-) > I will hold-on with next versions of his patch till we agree where > exactly > it should be place. Please see my response[1] for some details. replied. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
