> > > > > > > An idea just struck me... Instead of looping through all the > > > > > udc's to find the right one, why not simply store a pointer to > > > > > the udc in struct usb_gadget? > > > > > > > > > > > We still have code to find usb_gadget_driver to iterate udc_list, it > > > is better to change all, we need to have solution to consolidate > > > struct usb_udc, struct usb_gadget, and struct usb_gadget_drver. > > > I have no good solution now. > > > > I think it's okay to iterate through the list to find a > > usb_gadget_driver. But it's silly to iterate to find the usb_udc > > corresponding to a usb_gadget. > > Felipe, what's your opinion? > Hi Felipe, would you have comments for it? - Follow Alan's suggestion - Adding a new API like this patch - Drop this patch, and still iterate udc_list to get usb_gadget Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
