Hi,
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 04:07:50PM +0800, Sneeker Yeh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2014-12-29 14:41 GMT+08:00 Sneeker Yeh <sneeker.yeh@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2014-12-22 23:37 GMT+08:00 Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>:
> >
> >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:10:28AM +0800, Sneeker Yeh wrote:
> >> > Synopsis DesignWare USB3 IP Core integrated with a config-free
> >> > phy needs special handling during device disconnection to avoid
> >> > the host controller dying.
> >> >
> >> > This quirk makes sure PORT_CSC is cleared after the disable slot
> >> > command when usb device is disconnected from internal root hub,
> >> > otherwise, Synopsis core would fall into a state that cannot use
> >> > any endpoint command. Consequently, device disconnection procedure
> >> > might not be finished because sometimes endpoint need to be stop
> >> > by endpoint stop command issuing.
> >> >
> >> > Symptom usually happens when disconnected device is keyboard,
> >> > mouse, and hub.
> >>
> >> you need to point us to the synopsys STARS ticket number. That's the
> >> only way to reference this specific quirk. Add it to a comment
> >> somewhere.
> >>
> >
> > Thanks, we're still waiting for Synopsis STARS ticket number.
> > I'll add it to comment later.
> >
> >
> Sorry I didn't express myself clearly.
>
> So far Fujitsu Semiconductor got Synopsys internal case id , that is "
> Case: 8000679552".
> However the contents belongs this id cannot be referred except Fujitsu
> Semiconductor and Synopsys.
> Synopsis decide the official errata (STAR information) will be disclosed
> next February.
>
> Would you suggest if this quirk can be accepted with this case ID, or can
> only be accepted with STARS ticket number?
The thing is that without the STARS number I can't really verify which
versions of the IP would be affected. Clearly, it's not only your setup
and I think it's pretty unfair to have "is_compatible("fujitsu")" to
enable the quirk only for you. Isn't there a better way of enabling the
quirk based off of revision detection couple with a look on GHWPARAMS*
registers ?
What's tricking me is this claim that only config-free PHYs would be
affected, why ?
I still have many questions about this patch which are not answered by
commit log nor can I poke around on Synopsys solvnet for answers :-s
--
balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
