Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Baldyga [mailto:r.baldyga@xxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 9:40 AM > To: Mian Yousaf Kaukab; linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; balbi@xxxxxx > Cc: Herrero, Gregory; paulz@xxxxxxxxxxxx; > sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kaukab, Yousaf > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 16/29] usb: dwc2: gadget: kill requests after disabling > ep > > Hi, > > On 12/21/2014 05:15 PM, Mian Yousaf Kaukab wrote: > > kill_all_requests() can flush the fifo. Call it after disabling the > > endpoint. Moreover, remove even the current IN request so that next IN > > request after s3c_hsotg_ep_enable can be properly handled. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mian Yousaf Kaukab <yousaf.kaukab@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c | 5 +++-- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c > > index 031f7edc..4ccf59b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c > > +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c > > @@ -2612,8 +2612,6 @@ static int s3c_hsotg_ep_disable(struct usb_ep *ep) > > epctrl_reg = dir_in ? DIEPCTL(index) : DOEPCTL(index); > > > > spin_lock_irqsave(&hsotg->lock, flags); > > - /* terminate all requests with shutdown */ > > - kill_all_requests(hsotg, hs_ep, -ESHUTDOWN, false); > > > > hsotg->fifo_map &= ~(1<<hs_ep->fifo_index); > > hs_ep->fifo_index = 0; > > @@ -2630,6 +2628,9 @@ static int s3c_hsotg_ep_disable(struct usb_ep *ep) > > /* disable endpoint interrupts */ > > s3c_hsotg_ctrl_epint(hsotg, hs_ep->index, hs_ep->dir_in, 0); > > > > + /* terminate all requests with shutdown */ > > + kill_all_requests(hsotg, hs_ep, -ESHUTDOWN, true); > > + > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hsotg->lock, flags); > > return 0; > > } > > > > After this change function kill_all_requests() is always called with second > parameter = 'true', so we don't need to have this parameter anymore. > > I have already sent patch making that change: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/16/135 I am OK with your patch. I also want to call kill_all_requests after disabling the ep so I can just rebase this change on top of your patch. Felipe, should I already rebase on top of Robert's patch and mark it as dependency in my patchset or should I wait for the rebase till you apply Robert's patch to your branch? BR, Yousaf -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html