On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:33:09AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote: > On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 12:08:52PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 12:08:20PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 01:33:25PM +0000, Peter Chen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Antoine Tenart (7): > > > > > usb: move the OTG state from the USB PHY to the OTG structure > > > > > usb: rename phy to usb_phy in OTG > > > > > usb: add support to the generic PHY framework in OTG > > > > > usb: allow to supply the PHY in the drivers when using HCD > > > > > usb: chipidea: rename transceiver and phy to usb_phy > > > > > usb: chipidea: move usb_otg into struct ci_hdrc > > > > > usb: chipidea: add support to the generic PHY framework > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Felipe, > > > > > > > > I find you queue the patch 1st-4th and 7th in your next tree, how you queue > > > > the 7th without queueing 5th and 6th, they have some relationships. > > > > > > > > Will you queue 5th and 6th, or I queue them (5th- 7th) through my chipidea patch set? > > > > > > argh, somehow I missed them. I'll add both to my testing/next. Sorry for > > > the confusion. I thought I had them all. > > > > oh, they don't apply. > > > > Oh, I know the reason why you can apply 7th, without apply 5th and 6th. > At your next tree, the 4th, 5th, and 6th patches were squashed, and > it becomes "4th" patches in this series. > The shortlog is: > usb: allow to supply the PHY in the drivers when using HCD > commit id is: > "ef44cb4226d132146e44f8ea562a16b27ff61126" hmmm... not sure how I did that. Probably squashed them to avoid some build failures... -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
