Re: your mail

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/04/2014 08:10 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> Now, maybe something went wrong somewhere.  Perhaps the kernel thought 
> that after the system resume, the root hub was still in runtime 
> suspend.  If that's true, we need to find out why and fix it.

This is what I have so far (I have no idea what is correct / wrong I
just document what I figured out):
- good case no wakeup active.
  - usb_suspend() => choose_wakeup()
   "if (udev->state == USB_STATE_SUSPENDED && w !=
        udev->do_remote_wakeup)"
    w is 0 and do_remote_wakeup is 1. This means pm_runtime_resume() is
    invoked.
  - device status goes RPM_SUSPENDED => RPM_RESUMING => RPM_ACTIVE
  - after we are in usb_suspend_both() and udev->state is 7
    (USB_STATE_CONFIGURED), hub_suspend() is beeing invoked.
    The status urb is dequeued, RPM of usb1 is still RPM_ACTIVE

- in the bad case (wakeup active)
  - usb_suspend => choose_wakeup()
    - in the check above we do nothing because w and …do_remote_wakeup
      is 1
    - usb_suspend_both() does nothing because udev->state is 8
      (USB_STATE_SUSPENDED) so we leave. RPM of both devices (hub and
       usb1 is RPM_SUSPENDED)

--- now get back out of suspend ---
- usb_resume() is invoked with different RPM status.
- hub_activate() is invoked. The status URB is enqueued again, RPM
  remains unchanged.
- aaaaand we are done
- we get a HUB event, khubd is kicked.
- the hub invokes usb_autopm_get_interface() on the interface which is
  suspended. The hub device is suspended and has
  dev->power.no_callbacks set. Now:
  - in the "good" case it sees that the parent (usb1) is still
    RPM_ACTIVE so it sets the status of the status of hub to RPM_ACTIVE
    and leaves without doing anything.
  - in the bad case the ave RPM still set to RPM_SUSPENDED so we call
    resume for usb1 again which leads to the second status URB enqueue

So that is the history. I *think* that we shouldn't to hub_suspend() +
hub_resume() without changing the RPM status (the choose_wakeup()
difference). This might also fix the RPM status for usb1 which is in
RPM_SUSPENDED while it should be active (shouldn't it?) since it has
remote_wakeup active.

> 
> Alan Stern
> 
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux