On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:21:04PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 19:33 +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > > On 04/11/14 00:24, Greg KH wrote: > > > This isn't a stable issue... > > > > Sorry for disturbing then, let me go and read the documentation again. > > If I remember correctly, I asked Sylwester to mark this for stable. So > it's me that should be educated here. > > Why is a patch that allows the users of ARCH_S5PV210 to set > USB_EHCI_EXYNOS or USB_OHCI_EXYNOS - which they apparently need - for a > v3.17.y kernel, not a stable issue? As it's something that no one seemed to ever need before (i.e. it's not a regression fix), but it would be a "new feature", I don't think it's really a stable fix. But feel free to convince me otherwise :) thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
