On Tue, 4 Nov 2014, Lu Baolu wrote: > xhci: clear root port wake on bits if controller isn't wake-up capable > > When system is being suspended, if host device is not wakeup capable, > xhci_suspend() needs to clear all root port wake on bits. Otherwise, > some platforms may generate spurious wakeup, even if PCI PME# is dis- > abled. > > Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c > index 2a5d45b..cd57aae 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c > @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ > #define DRIVER_AUTHOR "Sarah Sharp" > #define DRIVER_DESC "'eXtensible' Host Controller (xHC) Driver" > > +#define PORT_WAKE_BITS (PORT_WKOC_E | PORT_WKDISC_E | PORT_WKCONN_E) > + > /* Some 0.95 hardware can't handle the chain bit on a Link TRB being cleared */ > static int link_quirk; > module_param(link_quirk, int, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR); > @@ -851,6 +853,42 @@ static void xhci_clear_command_ring(struct xhci_hcd *xhci) > xhci_set_cmd_ring_deq(xhci); > } > > +static void xhci_disable_port_wake_on_bits(struct xhci_hcd *xhci) > +{ > + int port_index; > + __le32 __iomem **port_array; > + unsigned long flags; > + u32 t1, t2; > + > + spin_lock_irqsave(&xhci->lock, flags); > + > + /* disble usb3 ports Wake bits*/ > + port_index = xhci->num_usb3_ports; > + port_array = xhci->usb3_ports; > + while (port_index--) { > + t1 = readl(port_array[port_index]); > + t2 = xhci_port_state_to_neutral(t1); > + t2 &= ~PORT_WAKE_BITS; > + t1 = xhci_port_state_to_neutral(t1); > + if (t1 != t2) > + writel(t2, port_array[port_index]); > + } > + > + /* disble usb2 ports Wake bits*/ > + port_index = xhci->num_usb2_ports; > + port_array = xhci->usb2_ports; > + while (port_index--) { > + t1 = readl(port_array[port_index]); > + t2 = xhci_port_state_to_neutral(t1); > + t2 &= ~PORT_WAKE_BITS; > + t1 = xhci_port_state_to_neutral(t1); > + if (t1 != t2) > + writel(t2, port_array[port_index]); > + } > + > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xhci->lock, flags); > +} > + > /* > * Stop HC (not bus-specific) > * > @@ -868,6 +906,10 @@ int xhci_suspend(struct xhci_hcd *xhci) > xhci->shared_hcd->state != HC_STATE_SUSPENDED) > return -EINVAL; > > + /* Clear root port wake on bits if not wakeup capable. */ > + if (!device_may_wakeup(hcd->self.controller)) > + xhci_disable_port_wake_on_bits(xhci); > + > /* Don't poll the roothubs on bus suspend. */ > xhci_dbg(xhci, "%s: stopping port polling.\n", __func__); > clear_bit(HCD_FLAG_POLL_RH, &hcd->flags); This is better but still wrong. Remember, this same code gets called for system suspend _and_ for runtime suspend. During runtime suspend, wakeup is always supposed to be turned on, even if device_may_wakeup() is false. That's because device_may_wakeup() refers only to system suspend. What you need to test is the do_wakeup flag, which should be passed into xhci_suspend() by xhci_pci_suspend() and xhci_plat_suspend(). Another problem is in the patch description and the comments. If device_may_wakeup() returns false, it doesn't mean the controller isn't wakeup-capable -- it means the controller isn't _allowed_ to wake up the system. Those are two different things. Finally, the code in xhci_disable_port_wake_on_bits() looks a little peculiar -- I'm not sure about all those calls to xhci_port_state_to_neutral(). But I'm not an expert on that; Mathias will have to advise on it. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html